{"id":2955,"date":"2022-04-26T18:27:41","date_gmt":"2022-04-26T18:27:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/climatetransform.com\/?p=2955"},"modified":"2022-07-05T08:04:13","modified_gmt":"2022-07-05T08:04:13","slug":"keep-fossil-fuels-in-the-ground-trees-standing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatetransform.com\/keep-fossil-fuels-in-the-ground-trees-standing\/","title":{"rendered":"Keep Fossil Fuels in the Ground & Trees Standing"},"content":{"rendered":"
Keeping fossil fuels in the ground and trees standing would solve the issue of climate change. It may sound simple, but this would alleviate most \u2013 if not all \u2013 of the effects of global warming.<\/span><\/p>\n Greenhouse gases in the atmosphere are increasing the Earth’s temperature.<\/span>1<\/sup><\/a><\/span><\/span> CO2 is the main greenhouse gas. It accounts for about 80 percent of all emissions.<\/span>2<\/sup><\/a><\/span><\/span> Burning fossil fuels and cutting down trees are two key sources of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions.<\/span>3<\/sup><\/a><\/span><\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Some fossil fuel companies are investing in carbon capture and storage (CCS) facilities. They see it as justification for extracting and using more oil, coal, and natural gas.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n This is because CCS technologies can capture CO2 from fuel combustion or industrial processes.<\/span>4<\/sup><\/a><\/span><\/span> It can then be transported and stored permanently underground.<\/span>5<\/sup><\/a><\/span><\/span> CCS has the potential to minimise CO2 emissions. This would allow the continued combustion of fossil fuels.<\/span><\/p>\n Currently, however, 80 percent of captured carbon is used for enhanced oil recovery.<\/span>6<\/sup><\/a><\/span><\/span> This means it is used to extract more fossil fuels. It is, therefore, not being stored to prevent it from contributing to global warming.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n CCS has had many expensive failures.\u00a0<\/span>For example, Algeria’s In Salah project was a joint CCS venture between BP, Statoil and national energy company Sonatrach.<\/span>7<\/sup><\/a><\/span><\/span> It cost an estimated USD $2.7 billion.<\/span>8<\/sup><\/a><\/span><\/span> The project captured and compressed CO2 from the Krechba gas field production site.<\/span>9<\/sup><\/a><\/span><\/span> This CO2 was then re-injected into a shallow gas reservoir two kilometres below the ground.<\/span>10<\/sup><\/a><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n Storage of captured CO2 began at In Salah in 2004.<\/span>11<\/sup><\/a><\/span><\/span> There were hopes that the project would store 17 million tonnes of CO2 over the following 20 years.<\/span>12<\/sup><\/a><\/span><\/span> However, the injection of CO2 into the rock formation was halted in 2011.<\/span> Concerns over CO2 leaking from the rock formation forced its early closure.<\/span>13<\/sup><\/a><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n Failures like this make the future of CCS uncertain. These failures, therefore, support the idea of simply leaving fossil fuels in the ground.<\/span><\/p>\n Our existing forests already remove about 30 percent of human-made CO2 emissions from the atmosphere.<\/span>14<\/sup><\/a><\/span><\/span> A mature tree captures on average about 22 kilograms of CO2 per year through photosynthesis.<\/span>15<\/sup><\/a><\/span><\/span> Over a 100-year lifespan, a tree can store a tonne of CO2.<\/span>16<\/sup><\/a><\/span><\/span>\u00a0<\/span>Without them, we will not be able to limit global warming to 1.5\u00b0C.<\/span>17<\/sup><\/a><\/span><\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Planting more trees<\/a> will help soak up more carbon. It is essential that the right trees are planted in the right places.<\/span>18<\/sup><\/a><\/span><\/span> It is also crucial to note that it can take decades for saplings to absorb as much CO2 as mature trees.<\/span>19<\/sup><\/a><\/span><\/span> For this reason, it is more important to leave our current trees standing than to plant more trees.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n In addition, forests are home to 80 percent of all land-based animals and plants.<\/span>20<\/sup><\/a><\/span><\/span> Razing forests means destroying their habitats. Planting trees cannot always replace complex ecosystems and fragile habitats. Deforestation is already responsible for an estimated 50,000 species going extinct every year.<\/span>21<\/sup><\/a><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n Fossil fuel companies that claim to offset their carbon emissions by planting more trees are not truly compensating for the damage they cause.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Shell and the Scottish government have come under criticism for \u2018greenwashing\u2019<\/a>.<\/span> Scottish ministers accepted GBP \u00a35 million from oil company Shell in 2019 to help fund a tree-planting program.<\/span> Shell aims to offset about 20 percent of its CO2 emissions by funding the planting or regeneration of one million trees.<\/span>22<\/sup><\/a><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n GBP \u00a35 million over five years for tree planting is minimal compared to what Shell invests in investigating new oil and gas reserves.<\/span>23<\/sup><\/a><\/span><\/span> It does not compensate for the CO2 emissions caused by extracting, refining, and burning fossil fuels.<\/span>24<\/sup><\/a><\/span><\/span> Those emissions will still be added to the atmosphere.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n To reduce the atmospheric concentration of CO2, we need to stop producing fossil fuels entirely. We also need to protect and enhance our best natural solution to climate change \u2013 forests. In other words, we need to leave our trees standing. <\/span><\/p>\n There is no other way to achieve the Paris Climate Agreement’s goals and prevent an environmental catastrophe.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Keeping fossil fuels in the ground and trees standing would solve the issue of climate change. It may sound simple, but this would alleviate most \u2013 if not all \u2013 of the effects of global warming. Greenhouse gases in the atmosphere are increasing the Earth’s temperature. CO2 is the main greenhouse gas. It accounts for […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":2957,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1,212],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\nCarbon capture and storage<\/h2>\n
Past CCS projects<\/h2>\n
Leave trees standing<\/h2>\n
Tree planting \u2018greenwashing\u2019 initiatives<\/h2>\n
Is the Shell and Scottish government deal greenwashing?<\/h2>\n
Preventing global warming<\/h2>\n